The Most Exciting Thing in American Politics

Over  the last 14 years, a movement has been growing to ensure that every President must win a majority of  the popular vote in order to be elected. This is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, and it’s really exciting.

It requires half of the Electoral College to come into effect, and it is more than halfway there to becoming ratified. It only needs 74 more electoral college votes in order to come into effect.

In the 2018 elections, Democrats picked up several critical governors races in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

This year we filled out a census, and every state is going to need to redraw is legislative boundaries within the next 12 months.

In all three of these states, the governor needs to approve of the legislative and congressional maps in order for them to be approved.

If these three states approve the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, it will be enacted in states worth 242 electoral votes.

Meaning we will only need 28 more votes in order to come into effect.

Nevada, Minnesota, and Virginia will likely have Democratic state legislatures by the next Presidential election, and they have 29 electoral college votes between them and have not ratified the compact yet.

If Tony Evers, and Tom Wolf use their power to force a fair legislative map, and Democrats pick up even a one seat majority each in all 6 chambers of their there state legislatures, we can approve the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact in those three states.

The Republicans have a one seat majority in the Minnesota State legislature. If we flip just one seat there and keep the governorship and the house, the first act to do is to pass the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact as soon as possible in 2023.

Democrats have a trifecta in Nevada, and we can have Nevada join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact at any point.

Democrats have a trifecta in Virginia, and we can have Virginia join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact at any point.

That will bring the compact to about 271 electoral college votes of the current apportionment

Except there is one snafu to this plan, the members of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (including Nevada, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Virginia) are likely going  to on net lose 5 seats in the Electoral College from the current redistricting, meaning that we will still need 4 more votes.

Fortunately for us, Maine has 4 electoral college votes and a Democratic Trifecta. If Maine joins the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact it will have 270 electoral college votes, which is enough to come into effect.

In this way, the governors of Wisconsin and Pennsylvania have more power than anyone else in America right now.  Michigan approves via an independent commission. They will determine within the next 12 months not just whether the House of Representatives will be a fair shot for the Democrats or heavily gerrymandered for the Republicans advantage, but with cooperation of just three states where Democrats already have a trifecta and another state where Democrats could very easily have a trifecta in 2023, we can bring the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact into force in time for the 2024 Presidential election with the minimum required number of votes.

In order to make it stick we should also try to get at least one more so it will continue to be in effect in 2032. For this, Arizona is our best bet. Democrats need only two more seats in the State House and 3 more seats in the State Senate to take over the legislature, and if we can take the governorship in Virginia (because I highly doubt Doug Ducey is going to support such a plan) we can possibly get a trifecta in 2022 which would mean we can bring the compact up to 281 electoral college votes, which should protect us from redistricting following the 2030 and 2040 censuses.

To the governors of those 7 states, please make history and nullify the Electoral College.


Click the map to create your own at 270toWin.com

2024 winning strategy

I honestly believe that if Kamala Harris had stayed in the race Warren would be President elect. The reason is because most Democratic states had yet to vote, and I think Bernie’s anti-Democratic rhetoric would have ended up hurting him and seeing a split moderate vote would have encouraged more progressives to vote for the candidate who has actually sponsored legislation which was signed into law in the last 20 years.

Warren would have stayed in the race to the end, she would have done better in the early primaries (because fewer voters would have voted for Sanders). She would have continued to stump for down ballot candidates throughout the entire campaign and she would have done better than both Biden and Sanders. It says a lot really, when Warren announced her candidacy there was Kamala Harris in the center, and she had a very clear path to the nomination. Kamala Harris dropping out before 2020 even began made that path far less clear, and Warren still pulled over 5% of the vote. She had the best performance of a candidate who came in third place in a Democratic Presidential primary since Paul Tsongas in 1992.
With only one New Democrat really in the race, and two progressives, a lot of would be Warren voters played it safe by voting for Sanders (who got more attention, because being unable to pass any laws he sponsored in the last 20 years nullifies him as a threat to establishment) which is how we ended up with Sanders getting over 20% of the vote. When we get to the general, with Warren as the nominee we would have had a lot more work by her campaign on down ballot races, which would have improved our chances in Maine and Iowa and also improved the chances of progressive candidates in the primary last August which would have meant we would have done better in the House elections, and we would already have 50 seats in the Senate for a trifecta.

The last 20 years have made it very clear to me that New Democrats are not safe picks in the General, but they are very strategic in ensuring that they get the nomination.

We have seen a resurgence of progressive nominees over the last 15 years because in 2000 and 2004 we saw two moderate Democrats as our nominee, one of them just barely lost, and Kerry was absolutely destroyed.
After losing twice in a row, that gave Obama a significant advantage by running on progressive values, progressives got control of the DNC, campaigned to issues Americans care about, and we got the biggest trifecta since FDR was president.
Sanders was never a very good candidate to be honest, and it shows in how much he lost the African American vote. This year I believe Warren was the best pick for President, with the longest coat tails in the race, but she was too progressive for cable news.
Because of this, Sanders got more attention, Warren got either ignored and attacked by her opponents more than any other, and we both lost seats in the House and the Senate is dependent on two runoffs in a state which hasn’t elected a Democrat to the Senate in over 20 years.
It is a really big problem that the main narrative is that Biden won, so his strategy worked. His strategy worked because he was campaigning against a pandemic, a 33% drop in GDP, and unemployment which was over 10%.
The question now is… will a moderate message work in an economy which has been growing for 3 years, an unemployment rate of 5%, no spoiler for the Republicans, and no epidemic? The last moderate candidate President who did that was Jimmy Carter, running against Nixon’s ghost.

The last moderate Democratic President before Carter was Woodrow Wilson, who was elected before my great-grandmother was born and then only because of a massive spoiler effect. History seems to imply that moderate Democrats lose without extreme circumstances and all of this is as the Republican Party has just become more and more extreme over the last century. 2024 is going to be a significantly different election from 2020, and we are going to ensure that we keep the House and gain the Senate in 2 years and then give Republicans the spanking they deserve in 2024 to force them to rethink their platform. I don’t expect another candidate like Ross Perot in the future, because if we were going to see one we would have seen one this year.

Without a spoiler, epidemic, or recession, the two campaigns we need to study and emulate are those of Obama in 2008 and Kennedy in 1960.

That will be a winning strategy, a campaign which speaks to voters, and for once we need to learn from history.

What to expect in the near future

The next 6 months are going to determine the next decade of American politics. The decisions of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris are going to deeply impact how many voters turn out in 2022, and this will significantly impact whether the Republicans win a trifecta in 2024.

I shouldn’t need to go in detail about how that would make a big difference, that would be a boring post.

But what is not boring is thinking about the few trajectories. There are several main questions which are going to significantly impact where our country is going to go into the long term.

Will Democrats win the Senate

The Senate races in Georgia are extraordinarily close, as I discussed in my previous post. Betting pools are swinging Republican and opinion polls are putting the races at a complete toss up. It will come down to the getting out the vote in Georgia on whether we get a trifecta in Georgia. The fact that it is a toss up at all is the result of an extreme amount of work by many people (primarily people of color) which is a shining example of the power of community organizing.

If the Democrats do not win the Senate (which opinion polls and betting pools are predicting) than we are looking at a minimum of two years of deadlock. Biden will have to do his governing by executive order, while ensuring that his executive orders do not get overturned by a court system which is extremely stacked by the last 4 Republican Presidents. The stacking of the courts over the last 6 years will significantly impact the ability of the Biden Administration to enforce important laws like the Voting Rights Act.

If the Democrats beat the odds and win the Senate, than it is of the utmost imperative that we do the following in order:

  1. Destroy the Filibuster, rendering the Republicans powerless
  2. Balance the courts
  3. COVID relief
  4. Health care reform
  5. Enforce the Voting Rights Act
  6. Win 2022 by getting out the vote and mobilizing on the momentum we build in the next congressional session

If we fail to take hold of the momentum we get if we win both seats in Georgia, we will pay for it in 2022.

If we succeed in getting the majority in the Senate, and Democrats govern and campaign in a way which makes it clear that any dysfunction is from the Senate holding up funding, then everyone in America will benefit.

If the Republicans succeed in maintaining control of the Senate, Democrats need to get their messaging on target and ensure that the blame is as much on McConnell as possible, get out the vote in the key states to take over the Senate so that we can pass important legislation in 2023.

We need to do everything in our power to control the narrative and make sure that McConnell is held responsible for holding up budgets and laws which the American people need. If we compromise or hold back from calling them out on not cooperating on very basic governance work (I’m not talking about abortion, enacting a carbon tax, or expanding AMTRAK, I’m talking about passing a bloody budget) then Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris need to do everything they can to make sure that it is abundantly clear to the American people that it will be Mitch McConnell’s fault that basic governing isn’t getting done. If we don’t get that right over the next two years in this scenario, we will pay for it in 2022 with lower voter turnout, and a disappointing election.

However, if we make it clear that government dysfunction is from the Senate blocking funding for essential government programs we all rely on then we will all benefit from it after Biden’s midterms.

We must get this right.

2020 Senate Elections, part 1

I’ll get this off my chest… this year’s Senate elections were the biggest electoral disappointment of my life. Massive epidemic, a historic recession, and the Democrats seriously under performed up and down the ballot.

The Senate election odds and polling were both favoring a Democratic win, and that fizzled out completely. https://bookies.com/news/senate-races-odds-tracker

Democrats were expected to pick up Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, Maine, and North Carolina (although Iowa’s odds flipped late in the election as it started to become clear the Democrats had very little steam), which brought them from a projected 50/50 majority (along with the Vice Presidency) to a Senate in peril.

The odds for both races in Georgia currently favor the Republicans to keep their 15 year hold on the Senate seats from Georgia.

This year’s election is likely going to be the first time since 1968 where a new President was elected without their party also taking or maintaining control of the Senate.

We must also remember that the last Democratic Senators from Georgia were very conservative as well.

Don’t misunderstand me, I am very grateful for the work Stacey Abrams and so many others are doing in Georgia which has made the state competitive, and everyone who wants to make a difference should do what they can to help the election of two Democrats in Georgia. We would have to defeat two incumbent Republicans to get a Democratic Senate. David Perdue was elected with 52.9% of the vote in 2014.

We must understand the odds currently favor Republicans in every way.

I want people to not be surprised in January when the Republicans will most likely keep control of the Senate. After the massive under performance outside of Georgia, we should avoid getting their hopes too high.

If the most likely outcome happens this year, we need to not lose hope and keep in mind that there are significant pick ups to be made in 2022 in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Iowa. Those three seats will give the Democrats a narrow majority.

But it is impossible for me to overstate how important it was this year for Democrats to win in both Iowa and Maine, and what a massive loss those two races are for our country.

I do not want this to be misconstrued as understating the amazing work which is being done in Georgia. Stacey Abrams and all of the other activists are an incredible force for good for this country, and they made an incredible difference already. the fact that they made the race against David Perdue competitive, when he won with 7 points more than his opponent 6 years ago is nothing short of incredible. They turned multiple solid Republican races into highly competitive races, almost out of the blue.

But we shouldn’t underestimate the deep cultural forces they are pushing against right now in the heart of the South, and keep in mind that in two years there are going to be several races where we could perform extremely well with the right candidates which will likely give the Democratic Party control of the Senate. That is where I am placing my hopes.

2020 Presidential election analysis

The 2020 Presidential election is finally over. Joe Biden is going to be the first New Democrat President since Bill Clinton.

This post will have 4 main parts, the first will look at how Joe Biden did compared to his predecessors over the last 30 years,  the second part will look at individual state results and how they have evolved to give Joe Biden the victory, the third part will look at nationwide exit poll data for 2004, 2008, 2016, and this year, and the conclusion part will ask how 2024 looks based on these trends and what an election without Trump might look like, and what sorts of strategies will likely work based on historical results.

Overall

In the 1992 and 1996 elections Bill Clinton won very narrow margins twice. He won only 43% of the vote in 1992 and 49.2% of the vote in 1996. Bill Clinton covered a number of southern states in both elections, which no Democrat has managed to do since.

In 2000 Al Gore almost won by a very narrow margin which of course many believe was stolen from him in the famous Bush v. Gore decision which stopped counting ballots before they finished. He carried the Midwest, but he lost Ohio and Florida giving Bush a very narrow win. He won the popular vote.

In 2004 George W. Bush won a majority of the popular vote, and picked up New Mexico and Iowa giving him a total of 286 electoral college votes.

President Obama became the first Democratic President since Jimmy Carter to win a majority of the popular vote, and won 365 electoral college votes. He ran a campaign focused on reforming health care and getting money out of politics. He carried the largest trifecta with more seats in the Senate than any time since 1976, the largest majority in the House since 1936, a majority of State governorships,This is the and a majority of State legislatures. Democrats gained trifectas in Wisconsin, New York, and Delaware.

The 2012 election continued to see Obama pull over 50% of the vote, expanding his campaign to be unabashadly pro-gay marriage and announcing how he supports free community college. Democrats won more votes for congress, but due to gerrymandering Republicans retained their majority from 2010.

In 2016 Hillary Clinton lost very narrow margins in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. She was the first Democrat to lose Michigan since Michael Dukakis in 1988, and the first Democrat to lose Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan in 1984. Republicans won slightly more votes for the House.

This year in 2020 Joe Biden became the first New Democrat to ever win a majority of the popular vote. He lost seats in the House from his caucus at the same time.

Incoming Presidents have lost seats in the House from their party in 2020, 2016, 2000, 1992,  and 1960.

Incoming Presidents have gained seats in the House from their party in 2008, 1980, 1976, and 1968.

There appears to be no correlation between a new President being elected and gaining or losing seats in congress. 1980 saw the largest gains for an incoming President with 34 new seats for Republicans, although no majority. 2008 saw the largest gain for an incoming President along with a majority in their party, with 21 new seats which provided 257 seats.

Over the last 92 years, there have  been Republican trifectas elected in 1928, 1930, 1952, 2002, 2004, and 2016. There have been Democratic trifectas in 1932, 1934, 1936, 1938, 1940, 1942, 1944, 1948, 1960, 1962, 1964, 1966, 1976, 1978, 1992, and 2008. We have had far more Democratic trifectas than Republican trifectas in recent American history.

One flaw with this simplistic type of analysis is that before 1994 there were a lot of Southern Democrats in the Democratic Party who were very different from Northern Democrats. Newt Gingrich defeated a lot of moderate Democrats which has ended up with the two parties having less overlap today than they used to.

The deeper finding in this data is what made 2008 different from every other year since the post-1994 realignment. I find there are two things different from 2008 as opposed to every other election since Gingrich’s contract with America.

  1. Our Presidential candidate was not from the New Democrat Coalition, and focused on a message of hope and change.
  2. The Democratic Party under the leadership of Howard Dean fully embraced a 50 state strategy which led to gains at every level of government.

The Democratic Party has not run a candidate who is not from the New Democratic Coalition along with the 50 state strategy in any other year since the realignment of 1994.

When you take into account the fact that the Democratic party was a lot more ideologically pure in 2008 it makes 2008 even more remarkable than a simple party count will do. After a few switches we had 60 seats (given two Independents who caucus with Democrats) which is enough to overcome a filibuster. This is the only time this has happened without a large number of Northern Republicans being required to override a filibuster.

There have only been three major gains for the Democratic Party in the House since 1994, those occurred in 2006, 2008, and 2018. Democrats had the largest gain of seats in Congress during a Presidential election year since Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 2008. It is the first of only two times in the last 30 years where the Democrats did not run a New Democrat. The other time was President Obama’s reelection.

Individual States

*when I use the word “significant” I mean that it brought the candidate over 50% support in a demographic.

Arizona

Biden pulled his most impressive win in Arizona by far.  He was only the second Democrat to win Arizona since 1948. when Harry Truman was the last President to win it by over 50 points. Bill Clinton won a small majority in Arizona in 1996. The Democrats also performed extremely well in the Senate. This is going to be the first time the Democrats have controlled both seats in Arizona since 1953 when Ernest McFarland lost his seat. We also took over the State Senate and are only one seat behind in the State House. I will do a deeper analysis on which seats we won and lost in the State legislature in its own post.

It looks like President-elect Biden won the Hispanic vote by 63%, he won voters under the age of 30, and he won a majority of the vote in cities, particularly for people of color. Biden also won the white college graduate vote.

This strongly indicates that Democrats need to really focus on increasing ballot access for voters in cities if we are to win future elections. We should focus on getting out the vote on college campuses.

Florida

Florida was missed even though the polls expected Biden to win it. During the same night, Florida voted for a $15 minimum wage with a 2/3 majority as well.

Biden won the Black vote, Hispanic/Latino vote, voters under the age of 30, the college graduate vote, the city vote. Gender and whether you have a college degree was not a significant factor for turnout. Trump did better among noncollege graduates than college graduates, but not significantly. Trump won the Cuban vote which makes 6% of the population with 56% of the vote, just like he did in 2016.

Similar indicators for Arizona, Democrats need to make sure people of color in cities can vote easily.

We need to do everything we can to preserve no excuse mail in voting in Florida.

Georgia

This was the first time Georgia voted for a Democrat since 1992. What really made the difference was the incredible work Stacy Abrams did in getting out the vote in key Democratic demographics, primarily African Americans.

Biden won voters under the age of 45, African American and Hispanic voters, college graduates, families who make under $50,000 a year, and won a majority in Atlanta and Atlanta suburbs. Gender did not make a significant impact to the election, except among Latinos. Latino men voted for Trump, Latino women voted for Biden. There also were more Latino women voting than Latino men. College education did not make a significant impact, but Biden did do a lot better among people with a college degree.

Michigan

Michigan has voted for Democrats every year (except 2016) over the last 30 years.

Kerry, Gore, and Clinton all got around 51% of the vote.

President Obama got 54% and 57% of the vote, and Gretchen Whitmer got 53% of the vote.

New Democrats had their best performance in Michigan of 51% against Dole and Bush. Bill and Hillary Clinton failed to pass the 50% threshold in 1992 and 2016. They campaigned differently from Obama. President Biden is only barely scraping past the 50% mark, and he is about to become the first New Democrat to ever win a majority of the vote in Michigan, by just a hair.

Joe Biden is on track to win Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia with less than a majority after a recession and epidemic which the sitting President has not helped us recover from. These 5 states carry 63 electoral college votes.President Obama and Gretchen Whitmer offered very daring visions for the United States and direct solutions to the problems people faced in this state Democrats must win in order to win. Clinton and Biden ran more lukewarm campaigns which didn’t focus on the same issues Obama focused on and got lukewarm results.

Jimmy Carter is the only Democratic president in the last 70 years to win the Presidency and not win Michigan.

With all of this being said, we need to understand where we picked up voters in this critical state.

Biden won younger voters, people of color, families who make less than $50,000 per year, union voters, city voters, Wayne county and Southeast MIchigan, and white college graduates. Gender did not make a significant impact when controlling for race, although Biden did poll better with women. Women had better turnout then men.

Get out the vote on college campuses and to low income neighborhoods in Greater Detroit and Democrats will win Michigan in 2022 and 2024.

Biden flipped White college graduates as opposed to 2016. We must retain the White college graduate vote in future elections.

Given the core of the Democratic party, this should be easy. Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan came closer to winning the high school vote than Clinton did, but did significantly better than  both Clinton or Biden with voters who have some college or an Associates Degree.

Also, I do not believe that it was simply the issue of lead pipes in Flint, Michigan for her success. Thousands of U.S. Areas have issues with lead in their pipes, and those states continue to elect Republicans who do nothing. Whitmer won because of her campaigning style, moving Michigan from giving 58% of their vote to Snyder in 2010 to 53% of their vote to Whitmer in 2018.

If the Democratic Party is wise, they will learn from her success and replicate it.

Nevada

Similar to Michigan, President Obama appears like he will continue to be the only Democrat to win over 50% of the vote in Nevada since 1964.

I expect it is for the same reason.

Biden won voters under the age of 45, college graduates, suburb voters, Washoe county (Reno), nonwhite voters. Gender did not make a significant difference when controlling for race except among Latino voters. Biden tied Trump among White college graduates and lost White noncollege graduates.

Ohio

Joe Biden is the first Democratic President to lose Ohio since John F. Kennedy in 1960. Ohio has voted for the winner of the Electoral college in every Presidential election since 1900 except for in in 2020, 1960, 1944. It will likely continue  to be a bellwether in the future.

Biden won voters under the age of 45, college graduates, low income households, cities with over 50k people, and white college graduates, and people of color. Gender did not make a significant difference although Biden did poll better among women.

If we get out the vote in big cities we can win Ohio in 2024.

Pennsylvania

Al Gore and John Kerry just barely passed the 50% margin in Pennsylvania, and Obama won Pennsylvania by 52% in 2012 nonwhite people.and 54% in 2008. Bill and Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden failed to pass 50% of the vote in this state.

Biden won voters under the age of 45, college graduates, people who make under $50,000 per year, people in big cities. Gender did not make a significant difference controlling for race, although Biden did poll significantly better among white women who were more likely to turn out to vote. Biden won white college graduates.

Wisconsin

Barack Obama’s campaign was the only Presidential campaign since 1964 to win over 50% of the vote in Wisconsin. He did it twice.

Biden won the college graduate vote, people who make under $50,000 a year, cities with over 50k people. Wisconsin is unique among swing states in that gender made a significant difference among white people with Biden winning the vote of 52% of white women. He won white college graduates and people of color.

Nationwide exit poll data

Vote by Education:

Year No High School HS Graduate Some College College Graduate Post Grad
2004 0.5 0.47 0.46 0.46 0.55
2008 0.63 0.52 0.51 0.5 0.58
2012 0.64 0.51 0.49 0.47 0.55
2016 0.46 0.43 0.49 0.58
2020 0.48 0.52 0.51 0.62

Obama won such margins because his policies appealed to High School Graduates.

The only three successful Democratic Presidents to successfully pull voters from Republicans were Carter in 1976, Clinton both times, and Obama in 2008.


Obama’s platform was the first Democratic platform to capture voters whose family income is above $75k. This is probably due to the recession, given that Biden also managed to pull voters who make between $50k and $100k. This is also likely because Obama lost these voters in 2012 but still commanded 63% of voters who make under $30k and 57% of voters who make between 30k and 49k.

Obama’s platform was the only modern candidate to get a majority of the vote from people who only have a high school graduate.  People with only a high school education often vote for the winner of presidential elections, so we need to make sure that our platform appeals to them and win that demographic by at least 50%. People with some college have played kingmaker in all of the last 5 Presidential elections, and President Obama won them twice.

Let’s learn from our successes and not replicate our failures.

Going Forward

Given the results of this election night, the biggest most important rule of the elections going forward if not just in general for the rest of time is this…

Do NOT speak out against progressive initiatives which have won at the ballot box in swing states

This should be extremely obvious to anyone with any experience working in politics.

It took a recession with unemployment peaking over 10% and a literal epidemic under a Republican President to elect a New Democrat in the modern era. Even with that incredibly favorable situation, Joe Biden is on track to win Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia with less than a majority after a recession and epidemic which the sitting President has not helped us recover from. These 5 states carry 63 electoral college votes, and if they had flipped to Trump, Biden would have lost. 3 of those states worth 36 electoral college votes which have a total of do not have Republican Trifectas, which brought Biden down to only 270 if they had flipped to Trump.

If we want to win in swing states we need to do a deep autopsy of the campaign messaging of Barack Obama and ensure that whoever we run in 2024 will have similar messaging which works in critical swing states and carry significant benefits in down ballot races for state legislatures and congresses.

I absolutely do not think that we are seeing losses in these states “because of Donald Trump”. Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are getting similar results to other New Democrats we have run in swing states. From this comparison of how New Democrats and Obama performed my conclusion is simple.

Moderate messaging does not work as well in swing states as opposed to a strong progressive platform focusing on health care, eliminating corruption, and free community college. Progressive messaging provides overwhelming wins for the Presidency which leads to historically strong performance in State Legislatures and Congress. There appears to be no significant impact between the first election of their candidate and their reelection.

All of the evidence from both Presidential and state races I have looked at supports this conclusion.

We should replicate our results in 2024.

References

New York  Times 2020 exit polls

Wikipedia for election results

2004 exit polls
2008 Exit polls
2012 exit polls

Why the Electoral College Exists

There are a lot of different claims about why the Electoral College exists here in the United States. The arguments from Wikipedia from supporters states:

Supporters argue that it is a fundamental component of American federalism. They maintain the system elected the winner of the nationwide popular vote in over 90% of presidential elections; promotes political stability; preserves the Constitutional role of the states in presidential elections; and fosters a broad-based, enduring, and generally moderate political party system.

I’m going to go down these arguments one by one.

Over 90% accuracy

This is true, it rarely skews from the winner of the popular vote.

Promotes Political Stability

That must be why we had massive political protests after the 2016 election and why after losing the popular vote President Bush signed into law the PATRIOT ACT, effectively suspending parts of the Constitution through a vague unachievable goal in a war we will never win. Stability doesn’t mean good. It also doesn’t promote more stability compared to other democracies.

Constitutional role of the states in presidential elections

This is a deontological argument. There has been a long standing thread in American politics which argues that states needs rights. Who controls the states? Historically the rich and powerful who are more likely to be involved in state level politics, while most people ignore them.

Also, the Senate used to be elected by state legislatures, so the Constitutional role of states has fundamentally changed since our founding.

Fosters a broad-based, enduring and generally moderate political party system

There is nothing moderate about the PATRIOT ACT, which wouldn’t exist if we did not have the electoral college.

Forces candidates to look at less populated states

This is simply not the case if you look at where the money goes. Money and campaign visits get concentrated in the handful of states which are most likely going to tip. States like California, New York, Wyoming, and North Dakota are always ignored. Even Maine and New Hampshire despite being swing states barely get any campaign visits.

If Joe Biden wins both North Carolina and Florida on Tuesday, he could win without winning a single state which has fewer than 10 electoral college votes.


Click the map to create your own at 270toWin.com

The Electoral College makes small states irrelevant for the Presidency.

The Horrible Truth

So, if those arguments are not the reason for the electoral college, we have to start by outlining why we have the system we do today and understand the two basic ways heads of government are generally selected.

Democracies generally fit into one of two camps when it comes to the selection of their head of government. You are generally either a Presidential democracy where the head of government is elected by the people, or you are a Parliamentary or Semi-Presidential democracy where the head of government is selected by the parliament. Presidential democracies dominate in the Americas, Parliamentary and Semi-Presidential systems dominate in Europe.

America is a unique Presidential democracy in how we have the electoral college between the people and the President.

When our country was founded, 17.8% of the population was enslaved (according to the 1790 census). These slaves were concentrated in the south of course, with as many as 43% of South Carolina’s population being enslaved and 292,627 slaves in Virginia. The Founding Fathers needed to find a way to elect a head of government in a way which preserved slave power, and the Great Compromise.

Parliamentary democracies usually elect their head of government by a simple majority of one house of their parliament. This person is generally called a Prime Minister. Pretty simple.

But the United States is more complicated and relatively unusual because we have two coequal branches of our legislative body.  If only one branch of Congress elected the president, the coequality would be immediately thrown out of whack.

This led to several options. Having eligible voters do a direct vote could not work and still preserve slave power because it would undo the 3/5 compromise which entrenched slave power at the time. This preservation of slave power is why we do not elect our President directly

So, in order to preserve the delicate balance needed to prevent fracturing the country and having coequal branches the Electoral College was designed. Each state has a number of votes equal to its representation of congress which dilutes the power of cities and increases the power of slave owners, and those members vote for the President. A simple majority is required to elect a president and if no majority is achieved then the Senate selects the President and the House selects the Vice President (this system has been modified since our country was founded).

The main takeaway is that the Electoral College exists to protect slavery.

But notice that note… The electoral college has already been changed in how it works. Every state votes for the President now and the electors vote like the citizens of the state by custom. That by itself is not how the Electoral College worked in the beginning when State Legislatures decided how their electors would be determined.

We changed the Electoral College.

It was designed to preserve an institution which is now extinct.

We can abolish the Electoral College as soon as we recognize as a nation the evil reason why it existed in the first place.

Slavery will never be truly extinct as long as the Electoral College survives.

2020 Elections to watch

Here are the races I am watching this year:

  1. Federal

1.1. Executive

  • The Presidential election, because duh.
    • If Biden wins Arizona and Florida tonight, he is all but guaranteed to win the presidency.

1.2. Senate

  • Alabama, likely Republican pickup
  • Arizona
  • Colorado
  • Georgia
  • Iowa
  • Maine
  • North Carolina

1.3 House

2. State

2.1. Governors

  • Montana, Mike Cooney
    • Extremely tight race which could go either way

2.2. State Legislatures

  • Arizona House, 31-29 Republican
  • Arizona Senate,  17-13 Republican
  • Minnesota Senate, 35-32 Republican

 

The United States Constitution

If you go look at history in other countries, you find that in Parliamentary democracies they have failed whenever a far right government came into power.

Germany in 1933 is the most famous example, but similar systems in Spain led to Franco, and the United Kingdom’s election led to Brexit, which is threatening the country’s existence if Scottish Independence happens.

Parliamentary democracies and Presidential alike have a habit of becoming better over time. This is very clear on every freedom index in the world.But if you look at history, no Presidential democracy which has stood for 20 years has ever failed.

The Trump Presidency was the biggest threat to America’s democracy we have ever faced. The Republican Party gerrymandered, cheated, and rigged their way into power, but today on the day before the most important election of our country’s history, a Federal Court blocked a Republican attempt to prevent hundreds of thousands of Americans from having their vote count.

America might not be perfect, and there are many issues facing our country today. But EVERY Parliamentary Democracy in the world which has seen someone half as bad as Trump has fallen quickly without exception.

The United States combination of limited Federalism, Constitutionalism, and Courts has prevented us from falling to fascism like my family saw 87 years ago. Our system of government has proven time and time again to be possible to improve for the long term and damn near impossible to make worse except for small blips in history.

Even with a trifecta, the only thing Donald Trump was able to pass in law was tax reform.

Everything else he has done can be reversed in just 79 days.

I am a strong supporter of Constitutionalism, limited Federalism, and separation of powers. I believe strongly in Public Juries. The Bill of Rights of the United States is the greatest human rights document in the history of the world, and we are about to enter a great era of American History.

If we play our cards right we can make a lot of good this decade.

We are going to get a trifecta and we are going  to see major health care reform which is going to reduce the cost of drugs and end the number of Americans who are uninsured.

We are going to get a national carbon tax.

We are going to strike down every illegal voter discrimination law in the country before the next Presidential election.

We are going to end police brutality and proclaim that Black Lives Matter.

We are going to decriminalize drug use.

AMTRAK will be refurbished.

We will break up monopolies and nationalize natural monopolies.

We will defend the Bill of Rights and end unwarranted surveillance of Americans.

We will enact the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact before 5 November 2024.

We will make this country better.

We will proclaim that the United States is a nation not of rule of man, but the rule of law, and Donald Trump is going to be tried for his gross crimes and misdemeanors.

Tomorrow is the day where we reclaim our country and enter a great era of prosperity and greater equality than our country has ever known.

America is going to reclaim our natural place as the leader of the free world tomorrow.

The rest of the world awaits our election results.

https://www.npr.org/2020/11/02/930365888/federal-judge-dismisses-effort-to-throw-out-drive-through-votes-in-houston

The Future of Social Security

If you don’t know how OASI works, please read my first article in this series, How Social Security Works.

It should be common knowledge by now that Social Security has a massive surplus. This money is borrowed by the government as one of the largest parts of our government debt, accounting for over $2 trillion and is paid an interest rate which is about the same as inflation.

This happens because the Federal Government has received more money than it has paid out to retirees over the last 40 years due to the technology revolution we are in.

This is not going to last. Social Security will soon get as much from tax revenue as it pays out to retirees due to being an aging country, and it will never run a surplus again. The surplus in 2020 was only $2 billion, or $6 per person.

The Social Security Trust Fund is going to be fully depleted by 2037 unless we make some really drastic changes.

I don’t plan on retiring (unless if I get very lucky) until 2057.

As you see, this is a problem.

There are realistically 7 ways we can solve this problem, and I am going to go through the pros and cons of each.

Raise taxes

The easiest way to solve this problem without changing the way Social Security works is to raise taxes.

We can remove the cap on Social Security Wages, but this will be impossible to do politically because only 15% of the taxes you pay on income above $75,000 annual income counts for benefits. It also won’t solve the problem. Have fun.

We can increase taxes on the middle class. The problem is that someone who makes $50,000 per year is already paying an effective tax rate of 12.8% for retirement benefits which only add up to 25% of their salary, which is not enough to live on.  Increasing taxes on the median household, without increasing their benefits, for a program which already doesn’t pay enough for them to survive in retirement to a level which will save our current system is political Kryptonite.

Have fun.

Adjust spending

We can move Federal Spending from other places!

You can try to convince Republicans to switch money from the Department of Defense to pay for OASI. Have fun.

Or we can move money from Medicare/Medicaid and education assistance to pay for a program which only pays for 1/4 of people’s pre-retirement income.

Have fun with that.

Issue more bonds

Since the United States has its own currency we can just issue more Federal Debt to cover the Social Security system. This could have major impacts on the value of the United States Dollar given the scope of the problem. It’s not a wise solution.

The other option would mean higher taxes for Millennials when we are older, defeating the purpose. Paying higher taxes in the future to cover a program which is designed for our retirement but doesn’t pay enough to cover basic living expenses.

Have fun with that.

Reduce benefits

We can gradually reduce benefits on retirees until benefits are almost nothing. This will be the biggest fuck you to Millennials imaginable. Any politician who makes a real attempt to do this to a point where it will actually help will be voted out by my generation for ruining our future.

This is not possible to do.

Superannuation

We can allow people to get out of the system and give people the option to do a system like Australia or Singapore. Australians are the richest people in the world with their current system. This will mean that Millennials will get something for retirement, and not have to pay tax rates of 15% or 20% of our income (which will cut into our ability to save for retirement) to only get a retirement income which will be barely enough to pay our property tax or rent without covering our food. It will also mean fewer of us will need forms of welfare in retirement, saving a significant amount of money for state governments.

This could actually work.

Republicans sometimes talk about this solution, and have done it for decades. But even though they had opportunities to do this from 2003-2007 and from 2017-2019 they have never proposed a serious solution to it, instead giving massive tax breaks to millionaires as a precursor to defund investments in the United States. They have never been serious about this solution.

Foreign Workers

Have fun convincing Republicans to have hordes of foreign workers coming into the United States to save welfare.

As soon as Republicans get power again, this program will end, meaning it won’t save the current system.

Invest the Social Security Trust Fund

We can invest the Social Security Trust Fund into municipal bonds and the stock market so it can grow. This will at least postpone the point where we have to make more decisions in order to allow millennials to retire comfortably.

If we did this 30 years ago, this post would never have been written, and we could cancel the payroll tax today and pay out the beneficiaries for today’s seniors without ever touching the general fund.

Unfortunately neither party is serious about actually protecting the retirement of Americans given their actions. If your employer doesn’t offer a 401k you are more or less on your own. You can choose to do a tax deferred IRA, which is a lot better than nothing, but will force you to work until you are 65 unless you make enough money to have another fund on top of that to save for early retirement or work in one of a few professions like fire fighters who can retire at 55.

It still doesn’t address the issue of how OASI only pays for 25% of pre-retirement income however, and just maintains the current system where many Social Security retirees need  welfare in order to survive.

 

Millennials like myself need to know that when we turn 65 we will be able to retire comfortably.

The longer we wait to solve this problem, the more expensive it will be.

We need a solution.

We need it soon.

Vote for Joe

I cast my primary vote for Elizabeth Warren because I believe she had the best combination of strategy and progressive ideals, significantly more than any other candidate in the race. I voted for her despite her not really having a chance of winning because I wanted her to have as much influence at forming the platform as possible.

Because I believe in progressive ideals I am going to vote for Joe Biden. He probably would have been the  third or fourth candidate if I had been able to rank the primary, but we are looking at a situation where over 200,000 Americans have died from an epidemic we could have prevented, Trump coddles dictators, insults liberal leaders around the world, empowers domestic terrorists who threaten our civil servants, and he almost took healthcare away from millions of Americans. He has quite literally been endorsed by the Taliban.

I am going to vote for as many progressives on the ballot as I can, and I am going to vote for the man who is endorsed by Noam Chomsky, Julia Gillard, Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and practically every non-fascist organization and public figure in the United States and the world.

I am going to vote for the man who has fought for mass transit for half a century, authored the Violence Against Women’s Act, and against all odds as Vice President passed the largest health care reform in the history of the United States.

I am going to vote for Joe Biden, and I hope you will as well.